// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s namespace A { class A { friend void func(A); friend A operator+(A,A); }; } namespace B { class B { static void func(B); }; B operator+(B,B); } namespace D { class D {}; } namespace C { class C {}; // expected-note {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'B::B' to 'const C::C &' for 1st argument}} #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // C++11 or later // expected-note@-2 {{candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'B::B' to 'C::C &&' for 1st argument}} #endif void func(C); // expected-note {{'C::func' declared here}} \ // expected-note {{passing argument to parameter here}} C operator+(C,C); D::D operator+(D::D,D::D); } namespace D { using namespace C; } namespace Test { void test() { func(A::A()); // FIXME: namespace-aware typo correction causes an extra, misleading // message in this case; some form of backtracking, diagnostic message // delaying, or argument checking before emitting diagnostics is needed to // avoid accepting and printing out a typo correction that proves to be // incorrect once argument-dependent lookup resolution has occurred. func(B::B()); // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'func'; did you mean 'C::func'?}} \ // expected-error {{no viable conversion from 'B::B' to 'C::C'}} func(C::C()); A::A() + A::A(); B::B() + B::B(); C::C() + C::C(); D::D() + D::D(); // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression ('D::D' and 'D::D')}} } } // PR6716 namespace test1 { template <class T> class A { template <class U> friend void foo(A &, U); // expected-note {{not viable: 1st argument ('const A<int>') would lose const qualifier}} public: A(); }; void test() { const A<int> a; foo(a, 10); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'foo'}} } }