<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Debugging JITed Code With GDB</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
</head>
<body>
<h1>Debugging JITed Code With GDB</h1>
<ol>
<li><a href="#example">Example usage</a></li>
<li><a href="#background">Background</a></li>
</ol>
<div class="doc_author">Written by Reid Kleckner</div>
<!--=========================================================================-->
<h2><a name="example">Example usage</a></h2>
<!--=========================================================================-->
<div>
<p>In order to debug code JITed by LLVM, you need GDB 7.0 or newer, which is
available on most modern distributions of Linux. The version of GDB that Apple
ships with XCode has been frozen at 6.3 for a while. LLDB may be a better
option for debugging JITed code on Mac OS X.
</p>
<p>Consider debugging the following code compiled with clang and run through
lli:
</p>
<pre class="doc_code">
#include <stdio.h>
void foo() {
printf("%d\n", *(int*)NULL); // Crash here
}
void bar() {
foo();
}
void baz() {
bar();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
baz();
}
</pre>
<p>Here are the commands to run that application under GDB and print the stack
trace at the crash:
</p>
<pre class="doc_code">
# Compile foo.c to bitcode. You can use either clang or llvm-gcc with this
# command line. Both require -fexceptions, or the calls are all marked
# 'nounwind' which disables DWARF exception handling info. Custom frontends
# should avoid adding this attribute to JITed code, since it interferes with
# DWARF CFA generation at the moment.
$ clang foo.c -fexceptions -emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc
# Run foo.bc under lli with -jit-emit-debug. If you built lli in debug mode,
# -jit-emit-debug defaults to true.
$ $GDB_INSTALL/gdb --args lli -jit-emit-debug foo.bc
...
# Run the code.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /tmp/gdb/lli -jit-emit-debug foo.bc
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7f55164 in foo ()
# Print the backtrace, this time with symbols instead of ??.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7f55164 in foo ()
#1 0x00007ffff7f550f9 in bar ()
#2 0x00007ffff7f55099 in baz ()
#3 0x00007ffff7f5502a in main ()
#4 0x00000000007c0225 in llvm::JIT::runFunction(llvm::Function*,
std::vector<llvm::GenericValue,
std::allocator<llvm::GenericValue> > const&) ()
#5 0x00000000007d6d98 in
llvm::ExecutionEngine::runFunctionAsMain(llvm::Function*,
std::vector<std::string,
std::allocator<std::string> > const&, char const* const*) ()
#6 0x00000000004dab76 in main ()
</pre>
<p>As you can see, GDB can correctly unwind the stack and has the appropriate
function names.
</p>
</div>
<!--=========================================================================-->
<h2><a name="background">Background</a></h2>
<!--=========================================================================-->
<div>
<p>Without special runtime support, debugging dynamically generated code with
GDB (as well as most debuggers) can be quite painful. Debuggers generally read
debug information from the object file of the code, but for JITed code, there is
no such file to look for.
</p>
<p>Depending on the architecture, this can impact the debugging experience in
different ways. For example, on most 32-bit x86 architectures, you can simply
compile with -fno-omit-frame-pointer for GCC and -disable-fp-elim for LLVM.
When GDB creates a backtrace, it can properly unwind the stack, but the stack
frames owned by JITed code have ??'s instead of the appropriate symbol name.
However, on Linux x86_64 in particular, GDB relies on the DWARF call frame
address (CFA) debug information to unwind the stack, so even if you compile
your program to leave the frame pointer untouched, GDB will usually be unable
to unwind the stack past any JITed code stack frames.
</p>
<p>In order to communicate the necessary debug info to GDB, an interface for
registering JITed code with debuggers has been designed and implemented for
GDB and LLVM. At a high level, whenever LLVM generates new machine code, it
also generates an object file in memory containing the debug information. LLVM
then adds the object file to the global list of object files and calls a special
function (__jit_debug_register_code) marked noinline that GDB knows about. When
GDB attaches to a process, it puts a breakpoint in this function and loads all
of the object files in the global list. When LLVM calls the registration
function, GDB catches the breakpoint signal, loads the new object file from
LLVM's memory, and resumes the execution. In this way, GDB can get the
necessary debug information.
</p>
<p>At the time of this writing, LLVM only supports architectures that use ELF
object files and it only generates symbols and DWARF CFA information. However,
it would be easy to add more information to the object file, so we don't need to
coordinate with GDB to get better debug information.
</p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<hr>
<address>
<a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>
<a href="mailto:reid.kleckner@gmail.com">Reid Kleckner</a><br>
<a href="http://llvm.org/">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
Last modified: $Date: 2011-04-22 20:30:22 -0400 (Fri, 22 Apr 2011) $
</address>
</body>
</html>