/* * Copyright (C) 2007 The Guava Authors * * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. * You may obtain a copy of the License at * * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and * limitations under the License. */ package com.google.common.collect; import static com.google.common.collect.Lists.newArrayList; import static com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester.reserialize; import static com.google.common.testing.SerializableTester.reserializeAndAssert; import static java.util.Arrays.asList; import static org.junit.contrib.truth.Truth.ASSERT; import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible; import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible; import com.google.common.base.Function; import com.google.common.base.Functions; import com.google.common.collect.Ordering.ArbitraryOrdering; import com.google.common.collect.Ordering.IncomparableValueException; import com.google.common.collect.testing.Helpers; import com.google.common.testing.EqualsTester; import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester; import junit.framework.TestCase; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.Collections; import java.util.Comparator; import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.List; import java.util.Random; import java.util.RandomAccess; import javax.annotation.Nullable; /** * Unit tests for {@code Ordering}. * * @author Jesse Wilson */ @GwtCompatible(emulated = true) public class OrderingTest extends TestCase { // TODO(cpovirk): some of these are inexplicably slow (20-30s) under GWT private final Ordering<Number> numberOrdering = new NumberOrdering(); public void testNatural() { Ordering<Integer> comparator = Ordering.natural(); Helpers.testComparator(comparator, Integer.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE); try { comparator.compare(1, null); fail(); } catch (NullPointerException expected) {} try { comparator.compare(null, 2); fail(); } catch (NullPointerException expected) {} try { comparator.compare(null, null); fail(); } catch (NullPointerException expected) {} assertSame(comparator, reserialize(comparator)); assertEquals("Ordering.natural()", comparator.toString()); } public void testFrom() { Ordering<String> caseInsensitiveOrdering = Ordering.from(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER); assertEquals(0, caseInsensitiveOrdering.compare("A", "a")); assertTrue(caseInsensitiveOrdering.compare("a", "B") < 0); assertTrue(caseInsensitiveOrdering.compare("B", "a") > 0); @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") // test of deprecated method Ordering<String> orderingFromOrdering = Ordering.from(Ordering.<String>natural()); new EqualsTester() .addEqualityGroup(caseInsensitiveOrdering, Ordering.from(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)) .addEqualityGroup(orderingFromOrdering, Ordering.natural()) .testEquals(); } public void testExplicit_none() { Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(Collections.<Integer>emptyList()); try { c.compare(0, 0); fail(); } catch (IncomparableValueException expected) { assertEquals(0, expected.value); } reserializeAndAssert(c); } public void testExplicit_one() { Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(0); assertEquals(0, c.compare(0, 0)); try { c.compare(0, 1); fail(); } catch (IncomparableValueException expected) { assertEquals(1, expected.value); } reserializeAndAssert(c); assertEquals("Ordering.explicit([0])", c.toString()); } public void testExplicit_two() { Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(42, 5); assertEquals(0, c.compare(5, 5)); assertTrue(c.compare(5, 42) > 0); assertTrue(c.compare(42, 5) < 0); try { c.compare(5, 666); fail(); } catch (IncomparableValueException expected) { assertEquals(666, expected.value); } new EqualsTester() .addEqualityGroup(c, Ordering.explicit(42, 5)) .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(5, 42)) .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.explicit(42)) .testEquals(); reserializeAndAssert(c); } public void testExplicit_sortingExample() { Comparator<Integer> c = Ordering.explicit(2, 8, 6, 1, 7, 5, 3, 4, 0, 9); List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(0, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9); Collections.sort(list, c); ASSERT.that(list).hasContentsInOrder(8, 6, 7, 5, 3, 0, 9); reserializeAndAssert(c); } public void testExplicit_withDuplicates() { try { Ordering.explicit(1, 2, 3, 4, 2); fail(); } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) { } } // A more limited test than the one that follows, but this one uses the // actual public API. public void testArbitrary_withoutCollisions() { List<Object> list = Lists.newArrayList(); for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++) { list.add(new Object()); } Ordering<Object> arbitrary = Ordering.arbitrary(); Collections.sort(list, arbitrary); // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that // comparing any pair of elements gives the answer we expect. Helpers.testComparator(arbitrary, list); assertEquals("Ordering.arbitrary()", arbitrary.toString()); } public void testArbitrary_withCollisions() { List<Integer> list = Lists.newArrayList(); for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++) { list.add(i); } Ordering<Object> arbitrary = new ArbitraryOrdering() { @Override int identityHashCode(Object object) { return ((Integer) object) % 5; // fake tons of collisions! } }; // Don't let the elements be in such a predictable order list = shuffledCopy(list, new Random(1)); Collections.sort(list, arbitrary); // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that // comparing any pair of elements gives the answer we expect. Helpers.testComparator(arbitrary, list); } public void testUsingToString() { Ordering<Object> ordering = Ordering.usingToString(); Helpers.testComparator(ordering, 1, 12, 124, 2); assertEquals("Ordering.usingToString()", ordering.toString()); assertSame(ordering, reserialize(ordering)); } // use an enum to get easy serializability private enum CharAtFunction implements Function<String, Character> { AT0(0), AT1(1), AT2(2), AT3(3), AT4(4), AT5(5), ; final int index; CharAtFunction(int index) { this.index = index; } @Override public Character apply(String string) { return string.charAt(index); } } private static Ordering<String> byCharAt(int index) { return Ordering.natural().onResultOf(CharAtFunction.values()[index]); } public void testCompound_static() { Comparator<String> comparator = Ordering.compound(asList( byCharAt(0), byCharAt(1), byCharAt(2), byCharAt(3), byCharAt(4), byCharAt(5))); Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ImmutableList.of( "applesauce", "apricot", "artichoke", "banality", "banana", "banquet", "tangelo", "tangerine")); reserializeAndAssert(comparator); } public void testCompound_instance() { Comparator<String> comparator = byCharAt(1).compound(byCharAt(0)); Helpers.testComparator(comparator, ImmutableList.of( "red", "yellow", "violet", "blue", "indigo", "green", "orange")); } public void testCompound_instance_generics() { Ordering<Object> objects = Ordering.explicit((Object) 1); Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1); Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1); // Like by like equals like Ordering<Number> a = numbers.compound(numbers); // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order Ordering<Number> b = numbers.compound(objects); Ordering<Number> c = objects.compound(numbers); Ordering<Integer> d = numbers.compound(integers); Ordering<Integer> e = integers.compound(numbers); // This works with three levels too (IDEA falsely reports errors as noted // below. Both javac and eclipse handle these cases correctly.) Ordering<Number> f = numbers.compound(objects).compound(objects); //bad IDEA Ordering<Number> g = objects.compound(numbers).compound(objects); Ordering<Number> h = objects.compound(objects).compound(numbers); Ordering<Number> i = numbers.compound(objects.compound(objects)); Ordering<Number> j = objects.compound(numbers.compound(objects)); //bad IDEA Ordering<Number> k = objects.compound(objects.compound(numbers)); // You can also arbitrarily assign a more restricted type - not an intended // feature, exactly, but unavoidable (I think) and harmless Ordering<Integer> l = objects.compound(numbers); // This correctly doesn't work: // Ordering<Object> m = numbers.compound(objects); // Sadly, the following works in javac 1.6, but at least it fails for // eclipse, and is *correctly* highlighted red in IDEA. // Ordering<Object> n = objects.compound(numbers); } public void testReverse() { Ordering<Number> reverseOrder = numberOrdering.reverse(); Helpers.testComparator(reverseOrder, Integer.MAX_VALUE, 1, 0, -1, Integer.MIN_VALUE); new EqualsTester() .addEqualityGroup(reverseOrder, numberOrdering.reverse()) .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.natural().reverse()) .addEqualityGroup(Collections.reverseOrder()) .testEquals(); } public void testReverseOfReverseSameAsForward() { // Not guaranteed by spec, but it works, and saves us from testing // exhaustively assertSame(numberOrdering, numberOrdering.reverse().reverse()); } private enum StringLengthFunction implements Function<String, Integer> { StringLength; @Override public Integer apply(String string) { return string.length(); } } private static final Ordering<Integer> DECREASING_INTEGER = Ordering.natural().reverse(); public void testOnResultOf_natural() { Comparator<String> comparator = Ordering.natural().onResultOf(StringLengthFunction.StringLength); assertTrue(comparator.compare("to", "be") == 0); assertTrue(comparator.compare("or", "not") < 0); assertTrue(comparator.compare("that", "to") > 0); new EqualsTester() .addEqualityGroup( comparator, Ordering.natural().onResultOf(StringLengthFunction.StringLength)) .addEqualityGroup(DECREASING_INTEGER) .testEquals(); reserializeAndAssert(comparator); assertEquals("Ordering.natural().onResultOf(StringLength)", comparator.toString()); } public void testOnResultOf_chained() { Comparator<String> comparator = DECREASING_INTEGER.onResultOf( StringLengthFunction.StringLength); assertTrue(comparator.compare("to", "be") == 0); assertTrue(comparator.compare("not", "or") < 0); assertTrue(comparator.compare("to", "that") > 0); new EqualsTester() .addEqualityGroup( comparator, DECREASING_INTEGER.onResultOf(StringLengthFunction.StringLength)) .addEqualityGroup( DECREASING_INTEGER.onResultOf(Functions.constant(1))) .addEqualityGroup(Ordering.natural()) .testEquals(); reserializeAndAssert(comparator); assertEquals("Ordering.natural().reverse().onResultOf(StringLength)", comparator.toString()); } @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // dang varargs public void testLexicographical() { Ordering<String> ordering = Ordering.natural(); Ordering<Iterable<String>> lexy = ordering.lexicographical(); ImmutableList<String> empty = ImmutableList.of(); ImmutableList<String> a = ImmutableList.of("a"); ImmutableList<String> aa = ImmutableList.of("a", "a"); ImmutableList<String> ab = ImmutableList.of("a", "b"); ImmutableList<String> b = ImmutableList.of("b"); Helpers.testComparator(lexy, empty, a, aa, ab, b); } public void testNullsFirst() { Ordering<Integer> ordering = Ordering.natural().nullsFirst(); Helpers.testComparator(ordering, null, Integer.MIN_VALUE, 0, 1); } public void testNullsLast() { Ordering<Integer> ordering = Ordering.natural().nullsLast(); Helpers.testComparator(ordering, 0, 1, Integer.MAX_VALUE, null); } public void testBinarySearch() { List<Integer> ints = Lists.newArrayList(0, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9); assertEquals(4, numberOrdering.binarySearch(ints, 7)); } public void testSortedCopy() { List<Integer> unsortedInts = Collections.unmodifiableList( Arrays.asList(5, 0, 3, null, 0, 9)); List<Integer> sortedInts = numberOrdering.nullsLast().sortedCopy(unsortedInts); assertEquals(Arrays.asList(0, 0, 3, 5, 9, null), sortedInts); assertEquals(Collections.emptyList(), numberOrdering.sortedCopy(Collections.<Integer>emptyList())); } public void testImmutableSortedCopy() { ImmutableList<Integer> unsortedInts = ImmutableList.of(5, 3, 0, 9, 3); ImmutableList<Integer> sortedInts = numberOrdering.immutableSortedCopy(unsortedInts); assertEquals(Arrays.asList(0, 3, 3, 5, 9), sortedInts); assertEquals(Collections.<Integer>emptyList(), numberOrdering.immutableSortedCopy(Collections.<Integer>emptyList())); List<Integer> listWithNull = Arrays.asList(5, 3, null, 9); try { Ordering.natural().nullsFirst().immutableSortedCopy(listWithNull); fail(); } catch (NullPointerException expected) { } } public void testIsOrdered() { assertFalse(numberOrdering.isOrdered(asList(5, 3, 0, 9))); assertFalse(numberOrdering.isOrdered(asList(0, 5, 3, 9))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isOrdered(asList(0, 3, 5, 9))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isOrdered(asList(0, 0, 3, 3))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isOrdered(asList(0, 3))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isOrdered(Collections.singleton(1))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isOrdered(Collections.<Integer>emptyList())); } public void testIsStrictlyOrdered() { assertFalse(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(asList(5, 3, 0, 9))); assertFalse(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(asList(0, 5, 3, 9))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(asList(0, 3, 5, 9))); assertFalse(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(asList(0, 0, 3, 3))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(asList(0, 3))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered(Collections.singleton(1))); assertTrue(numberOrdering.isStrictlyOrdered( Collections.<Integer>emptyList())); } public void testLeastOf_emptyList_0() { List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.<Integer>asList(), 0); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.<Integer>of(), result); } public void testLeastOf_emptyList_1() { List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.<Integer>asList(), 1); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.<Integer>of(), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_negativeOne() { try { numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1), -1); fail(); } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) { } } public void testLeastOf_singletonList_0() { List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.asList(3), 0); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.<Integer>of(), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_0() { List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1), 0); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.<Integer>of(), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_1() { List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1), 1); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(-1), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_nMinusOne() { List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1); List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(list, list.size() - 1); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(-1, 3, 4), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_n() { List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1); List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(list, list.size()); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(-1, 3, 4, 5), result); } public void testLeastOf_simple_nPlusOne() { List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 4, 5, -1); List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(list, list.size() + 1); assertTrue(result instanceof RandomAccess); assertListImmutable(result); assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(-1, 3, 4, 5), result); } public void testLeastOf_ties() { Integer foo = new Integer(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 10); Integer bar = new Integer(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 10); assertNotSame(foo, bar); assertEquals(foo, bar); List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, foo, bar, -1); List<Integer> result = numberOrdering.leastOf(list, list.size()); assertEquals(ImmutableList.of(-1, 3, foo, bar), result); } @GwtIncompatible("slow") public void testLeastOf_reconcileAgainstSortAndSublist() { runLeastOfComparison(1000, 300, 20); } public void testLeastOf_reconcileAgainstSortAndSublistSmall() { runLeastOfComparison(10, 30, 2); } private static void runLeastOfComparison( int iterations, int elements, int seeds) { Random random = new Random(42); Ordering<Integer> ordering = Ordering.natural(); for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { List<Integer> list = Lists.newArrayList(); for (int j = 0; j < elements; j++) { list.add(random.nextInt(10 * i + j + 1)); } for (int seed = 1; seed < seeds; seed++) { int k = random.nextInt(10 * seed); assertEquals(ordering.sortedCopy(list).subList(0, k), ordering.leastOf(list, k)); } } } public void testGreatestOf_simple() { /* * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it. */ List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3); assertEquals(Arrays.asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4)); } private static void assertListImmutable(List<Integer> result) { try { result.set(0, 1); fail(); } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) { // pass } } public void testIteratorMinAndMax() { List<Integer> ints = Lists.newArrayList(5, 3, 0, 9); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(ints.iterator())); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(ints.iterator())); // when the values are the same, the first argument should be returned Integer a = new Integer(4); Integer b = new Integer(4); ints = Lists.newArrayList(a, b, b); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints.iterator())); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints.iterator())); } public void testIteratorMinExhaustsIterator() { List<Integer> ints = Lists.newArrayList(9, 0, 3, 5); Iterator<Integer> iterator = ints.iterator(); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(iterator)); assertFalse(iterator.hasNext()); } public void testIteratorMaxExhaustsIterator() { List<Integer> ints = Lists.newArrayList(9, 0, 3, 5); Iterator<Integer> iterator = ints.iterator(); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(iterator)); assertFalse(iterator.hasNext()); } public void testIterableMinAndMax() { List<Integer> ints = Lists.newArrayList(5, 3, 0, 9); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(ints)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(ints)); // when the values are the same, the first argument should be returned Integer a = new Integer(4); Integer b = new Integer(4); ints = Lists.newArrayList(a, b, b); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(ints)); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(ints)); } public void testVarargsMinAndMax() { // try the min and max values in all positions, since some values are proper // parameters and others are from the varargs array assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(9, 3, 0, 5, 8)); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 9, 0, 3, 8)); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 3, 9, 0, 8)); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 3, 0, 9, 8)); assertEquals(9, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 3, 0, 8, 9)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(0, 3, 5, 9, 8)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(5, 0, 3, 9, 8)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(5, 3, 0, 9, 8)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(5, 3, 9, 0, 8)); assertEquals(0, (int) numberOrdering.min(5, 3, 0, 9, 0)); // when the values are the same, the first argument should be returned Integer a = new Integer(4); Integer b = new Integer(4); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(a, b, b)); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(a, b, b)); } public void testParameterMinAndMax() { assertEquals(5, (int) numberOrdering.max(3, 5)); assertEquals(5, (int) numberOrdering.max(5, 3)); assertEquals(3, (int) numberOrdering.min(3, 5)); assertEquals(3, (int) numberOrdering.min(5, 3)); // when the values are the same, the first argument should be returned Integer a = new Integer(4); Integer b = new Integer(4); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.max(a, b)); assertSame(a, numberOrdering.min(a, b)); } private static class NumberOrdering extends Ordering<Number> { @Override public int compare(Number a, Number b) { return ((Double) a.doubleValue()).compareTo(b.doubleValue()); } @Override public int hashCode() { return NumberOrdering.class.hashCode(); } @Override public boolean equals(Object other) { return other instanceof NumberOrdering; } private static final long serialVersionUID = 0; } /* * Now we have monster tests that create hundreds of Orderings using different * combinations of methods, then checks compare(), binarySearch() and so * forth on each one. */ // should periodically try increasing this, but it makes the test run long private static final int RECURSE_DEPTH = 2; public void testCombinationsExhaustively_startingFromNatural() { testExhaustively(Ordering.<String>natural(), Arrays.asList("a", "b")); } public void testCombinationsExhaustively_startingFromExplicit() { testExhaustively(Ordering.explicit("a", "b", "c", "d"), Arrays.asList("b", "d")); } public void testCombinationsExhaustively_startingFromUsingToString() { testExhaustively(Ordering.usingToString(), Arrays.asList(1, 12, 2)); } public void testCombinationsExhaustively_startingFromArbitrary() { Ordering<Object> arbitrary = Ordering.arbitrary(); List<Object> list = Arrays.asList(1, "foo", new Object()); // There's no way to tell what the order should be except empirically Collections.sort(list, arbitrary); testExhaustively(arbitrary, list); } private static <T> void testExhaustively( Ordering<? super T> ordering, List<T> list) { // shoot me, but I didn't want to deal with wildcards through the whole test @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") Scenario<T> starter = new Scenario<T>((Ordering) ordering, list); verifyScenario(starter, 0); } private static <T> void verifyScenario(Scenario<T> scenario, int level) { scenario.testCompareTo(); scenario.testIsOrdered(); scenario.testMinAndMax(); scenario.testBinarySearch(); if (level < RECURSE_DEPTH) { for (OrderingMutation alteration : OrderingMutation.values()) { verifyScenario(alteration.mutate(scenario), level + 1); } } } /** * An aggregation of an ordering with a list (of size > 1) that should prove * to be in strictly increasing order according to that ordering. */ private static class Scenario<T> { final Ordering<T> ordering; final List<T> strictlyOrderedList; Scenario(Ordering<T> ordering, List<T> strictlyOrderedList) { this.ordering = ordering; this.strictlyOrderedList = strictlyOrderedList; } void testCompareTo() { Helpers.testComparator(ordering, strictlyOrderedList); } void testIsOrdered() { assertTrue(ordering.isOrdered(strictlyOrderedList)); assertTrue(ordering.isStrictlyOrdered(strictlyOrderedList)); } void testMinAndMax() { List<T> shuffledList = Lists.newArrayList(strictlyOrderedList); shuffledList = shuffledCopy(shuffledList, new Random(5)); assertEquals(strictlyOrderedList.get(0), ordering.min(shuffledList)); assertEquals(strictlyOrderedList.get(strictlyOrderedList.size() - 1), ordering.max(shuffledList)); } void testBinarySearch() { for (int i = 0; i < strictlyOrderedList.size(); i++) { assertEquals(i, ordering.binarySearch( strictlyOrderedList, strictlyOrderedList.get(i))); } List<T> newList = Lists.newArrayList(strictlyOrderedList); T valueNotInList = newList.remove(1); assertEquals(-2, ordering.binarySearch(newList, valueNotInList)); } } /** * A means for changing an Ordering into another Ordering. Each instance is * responsible for creating the alternate Ordering, and providing a List that * is known to be ordered, based on an input List known to be ordered * according to the input Ordering. */ private enum OrderingMutation { REVERSE { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { List<T> newList = Lists.newArrayList(scenario.strictlyOrderedList); Collections.reverse(newList); return new Scenario<T>(scenario.ordering.reverse(), newList); } }, NULLS_FIRST { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") List<T> newList = Lists.newArrayList((T) null); for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { if (t != null) { newList.add(t); } } return new Scenario<T>(scenario.ordering.nullsFirst(), newList); } }, NULLS_LAST { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { List<T> newList = Lists.newArrayList(); for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { if (t != null) { newList.add(t); } } newList.add(null); return new Scenario<T>(scenario.ordering.nullsLast(), newList); } }, ON_RESULT_OF { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(final Scenario<T> scenario) { Ordering<Integer> ordering = scenario.ordering.onResultOf( new Function<Integer, T>() { @Override public T apply(@Nullable Integer from) { return scenario.strictlyOrderedList.get(from); } }); List<Integer> list = Lists.newArrayList(); for (int i = 0; i < scenario.strictlyOrderedList.size(); i++) { list.add(i); } return new Scenario<Integer>(ordering, list); } }, COMPOUND_THIS_WITH_NATURAL { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { List<Composite<T>> composites = Lists.newArrayList(); for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { composites.add(new Composite<T>(t, 1)); composites.add(new Composite<T>(t, 2)); } Ordering<Composite<T>> ordering = scenario.ordering.onResultOf(Composite.<T>getValueFunction()) .compound(Ordering.natural()); return new Scenario<Composite<T>>(ordering, composites); } }, COMPOUND_NATURAL_WITH_THIS { @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { List<Composite<T>> composites = Lists.newArrayList(); for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { composites.add(new Composite<T>(t, 1)); } for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { composites.add(new Composite<T>(t, 2)); } Ordering<Composite<T>> ordering = Ordering.natural().compound( scenario.ordering.onResultOf(Composite.<T>getValueFunction())); return new Scenario<Composite<T>>(ordering, composites); } }, LEXICOGRAPHICAL { @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // dang varargs @Override <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario) { List<Iterable<T>> words = Lists.newArrayList(); words.add(Collections.<T>emptyList()); for (T t : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { words.add(Arrays.asList(t)); for (T s : scenario.strictlyOrderedList) { words.add(Arrays.asList(t, s)); } } return new Scenario<Iterable<T>>( scenario.ordering.lexicographical(), words); } }, ; abstract <T> Scenario<?> mutate(Scenario<T> scenario); } /** * A dummy object we create so that we can have something meaningful to have * a compound ordering over. */ private static class Composite<T> implements Comparable<Composite<T>> { final T value; final int rank; Composite(T value, int rank) { this.value = value; this.rank = rank; } // natural order is by rank only; the test will compound() this with the // order of 't'. @Override public int compareTo(Composite<T> that) { return rank < that.rank ? -1 : rank > that.rank ? 1 : 0; } static <T> Function<Composite<T>, T> getValueFunction() { return new Function<Composite<T>, T>() { @Override public T apply(Composite<T> from) { return from.value; } }; } } @GwtIncompatible("NullPointerTester") public void testNullPointerExceptions() throws Exception { NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester(); tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(Ordering.class); // any Ordering<Object> instance that accepts nulls should be good enough tester.testAllPublicInstanceMethods(Ordering.usingToString().nullsFirst()); } private static <T> List<T> shuffledCopy(List<T> in, Random random) { List<T> mutable = newArrayList(in); List<T> out = newArrayList(); while (!mutable.isEmpty()) { out.add(mutable.remove(random.nextInt(mutable.size()))); } return out; } }